Buddha�s visit to Naagadeepa by Sumana Saparamadu
Bak, the first full-moon day in the month of April is of
special significance to Buddhists in Sri Lanka. It was
on the full-moon day in the month of Bak, three years
after the Buddha�s Enlightenment that He came to Lanka.
This time it was His second visit to the island. The
first was in Daruthu, in the month of (January) to
Mahiyangana, seven months after His Enlightenment, to
quell an uprising of Yakshas. This time the purpose of
His visit was to stop two Naagas fighting over a
gem-studded seat. The two claimants to this seat were
Mahodara, the King of Naagadeepa and Chulodara, his
sister�s son.
Today we presume that Naagadeepa, the island broken off
the Jaffna peninsular was the venue of the battle, and
the site hallowed by the Buddha�s visit. But according
to the Dictionary of Pali Proper names compiled by Dr.
G. P. Malalasekera, from evidence in Pali texts and
commentaries, Mahodara was reigning over a kingdom by
the sea in northern Lanka, and this kingdom was
Naagadeepa identified with the modern Jaffna peninsular
and the north west of the island. At the time the Buddha
visited Lanka, in the third year after His
enlightenment, which is about 2592 years ago, this
island now known as Naagadeepa, (Nainativu in Tamil)
would have been a part of the peninsular. It is so close
to the coast that I was told it is now connected to the
mainland by a causeway. (Until about the first decade of
the 20th century, the island on which the Seenigama
Devala stands, was part of the mainland). In historical
times too this area was known as Naagadeepa one
Moothuthamby Pillay has stated in his History of Jaffna
that �the possessors of the country before the Tamils
were Naagas who were a �caste of men�.
Legend says that before the landing of Vijaya, Lanka was
inhabited by, among others, three main tribes or ethnic
groups namely Yaksha, Raaksha and Naaga. From scattered
references in the Vamsa Katha (historical accounts) and
commentaries to the Pali Sultas, we can conclude that
the Naagas occupied the North and North West of the
island, right down to the mouth of the Kelani river on
the west coast. Names like Nainamadama, a town in the
North western Province adds weight to this conclusion.
Madama is a travellers� way side rest. In ancient times
this �madama� would have been in the habitual
resting-place of Naagas on their North-South journeys.
Chulodara�s father, was living on Vaddamaana Pabbata.
There are no hills or hillocks in the Jaffna peninsular
or immediately saith, not until one gets closer to
Medawachchi.
On the day of the Buddha�s visit, there was in the
battle-field another king Maniakki (gem-eyed), sometimes
referred to him as Maniakkhika. He was the uncle of
Mahodara and his kingdom was the region north of the
Kelani river. As an elder kinsman perhaps he had come to
settle this dispute between
his nephew and grand nephew. Even as late as the 15th
century there were Naagas living in the vicinity of the
Kelani river. Proof of this is the verse in the
Selalihini Sandesa about the Naaga maidens sitting on
the river bank singing songs of praise to the Buddha.
All this is definite proof that the Naagas were not some
mythical beings but real human beings. There is in
North-East India today an ethnic group known as Naaga.
Let�s get back to the battle-field in Naagadeepa. The
sudden appearance of the Buddha, must have taken
everyone by surprise, even bewildered them and brought
the fighting to a standstill. For, there, up-above them
in the sky, was figure clad in yellow robes and another
holding a branch of a young tree over him as a sunshade.
The attendant was a deva Samiddhi Sumana, who lived in
the Rajayatana tree standing at the gate of Jetavana. He
accompanied the Buddha to Lanka holding a branch of the
rajayatana tree as a parasol over the Buddha�s head. It
was left behind for the Naagas to worship.
The Buddha�s commanding, gentle voice, drew the
attention of every Naaga, big and small. As they
listened they realised their folly. Among those who
listened attentively and was convinced that war was
meaningless and a waste of time, was the Naaga king from
Kelaniya, Maniakkhi.
When the Buddha finished speaking he came up to the
Buddha and begged of him to visit his kingdom. The
Buddha agreed. Five years were to pass before he came to
Kelaniya, in the eighth year after his Enlightenment.
The traditional belief is that this visit was on the
Wesak Full-Moon Day, but the Mahavamsa Deepavamsa and
the Samanta Paasaadika say it was on the second day
after the full-moon.
Nagadeepa - the whole peninsular - had many places of
pilgrimage is recorded in the Vamsakatha. Among them was
the Tissa Vihara built by King Devanampiya Tissa, near
the port Jambukola, Silaapabbata, Rajayatana Daatu
Cetiya to which king Aggabodi added the Unnalomaghara.
The Rajayatana Dhatu Cetiya may have been built on the
spot where the branch was placed or in honour of that
branch which was used as a parasol for the Buddha on his
journey from Jambudeepa to Naagadeepa.
The Rajayatana Dhatu Cetiya must have been, as this
legend attests a very prestigious place of worship in
the early Anuradhapura period of our history. �When the
Buddha sasana comes to an end all the Buddha relics in
Lanka will come together at the Maha Cetiya, then will
travel to Rajaayatana Daatu Cetiya and from there to the
Maha Bodhi in Gaya.� This is the legend recorded in the
Vibhanga Atthakatha and the Diganikaya Attakatha.
Some scholars say that the story of the Buddha�s three
visits to Lanka is only legend, no proof of that these
visits actually took place, that nowhere in the
Tripitaka is there any mention of these visits. But does
the Tripitaka record each and every place and person the
Buddha visited. In the 45 years from his Enlightenment
to his Parinibbana he must have visited countless
persons to ease their mental or physical pain, or to
admonish wrong doers and lead them on to the right path.
What is recorded in the Sutta Pitaka of the Tripitaka,
are what Ananda Thera had heard the Buddha expound.
Legends do not grow out of nothing. They grow from a
Kernel of truth that has come down in the folk memory.
Over the years the legend has been elaborated. |